| Results: | 1.) | Full throttle height in high speed with combat power corrected to normal temperature.
|
| | Intake 150 Ø | 20,997 ft. (6400 m)) | Desired value
| | Intake 155 Ø | 20,997 ft. (6400 m)) | n Intake = 0,9
| | Early intake | 20,505 ft. (6250 m)) | 22,966 ft. (7000 m)
|
| | 2.) | The total pressure at the intake entrance, ~ 50 kg/m2 higher than in the free flow, is due to prop wash.
| | | 3.) | The air temperature in the intake lies 2° above the ambient temperature. The heating thus lies within the measuring accuracy.
| | | 4.) | The supercharger air temperature at 8 km is 92°, the desired value is 107°. (after engine manual with consideration of the ambient temperature, lay 7° over CINA, and Stauauf heating.)
| | | | Currently, the known possible airframe-related reasons for the bad FTH have been examined and found to be in order, consisting of: 1.) Heating from exhaust gases, 2.) too narrow plenum chamber, 3.) insufficient ram in front of the intake.
Apparently, however, the supercharger air temperature, ~15° too low, can be attributed to the poor static head of the supercharger.
|
Augsburg, den 16.6.42 FEV/EK/Go. |
|
For the full report see:
| Results: | Flight | Vw | Vn | Vnk | Remarks
| | | 2 | 323 (520) | 321 (517) | 323 (520) | Paint easily cracked
| | | 3 | 322 (518) | 327 (526) | 329 (529) | Böig
| | | 4 | 319 (514) | 326 (525) | 328 (528) |
| | | 5 | 321 (517) | 327 (526) | 329 (529) | Wiederholung v.3
| | | 6 | 323 (520) | 326 (525) | 328 (528) |
| | | 7 | 319 (514) | 320 (515) | 322 (518) |
| | | 8 | 323 (520) | 322 (519) | 322 (519) |
| | | 9 | 321 (517) | 323 (520) | 323 (520) |
| | | 10 | 321 (517) | 320 (515) | 322 (518) |
|
| | (Speeds given in MPH, values in parenthesis in km/h)
|
| |
Vw represents the true speed on the test day at test altitude with actual engine power, while Vn represents the speed on a Normal Day at 820 ft altitude with
1,30 kg/cm2 boost and 1.80 kg/cm2 blower pressure. With Vnk a speed loss of 2 mph (3 km/h), caused by the radiator indicators, is taken into account. |
| |
For average comparison values, 327 mph (527 km/h) at 820 ft altitude and 323 mph (520 km/h) at Sea Level is obtained with specially treated machines. The corresponding values of the standard
production machines are 322 (519) and 318 mph (512 km/h). The speed increase thus averages 5 mph (8 km/h). |
| Sea level speeds after corrections: (Link to image)
| | | W.Nr. | V mph SL | V km/h 0m
| | | 13438 | 319 | 513
| | | 13439 | 313 | 504
| | | 13440 | 318 | 512
| | | 13442 | 318 | 512
| | | 13448 | 317 | 510
| | | 13496 | 319 | 514
| | | 13506 | 320 | 515
| | | 13500 | 317 | 510
|
|
For the full report see:
| Results: | For faultless opening operation the following points should be noted: |
| | 1.) | The slat’s trailing edge must lie quite tight against the wing, it must be so stiff that it can not be lifted by air pressure. |
| | | | The slats of the 109 G do not meet this requirement properly. In addition to the fact that they are built with too much play,
the rear edge is so flexible on some machines, that it is sucked out considerably. Therefore, the cover of the slats should
be strengthened and special attention has to be paid to a tight contact with the trailing edge during installation. |
| | 2.) | The slat roller track must be installed properly. |
| | | | The measurements - center connecting bolts to wing surface - must be adhered to as closely as possible. In order to ensure that
the slats open early enough for even somewhat bad installations, a slight tilting of the roller tracks would be required. (For measurements see page 5). |
| | 3.) | The slats themselves must be set up correctly. |
| | | | The tilting of the slat is to be used where possible to compensate for different opening times of the left and right slats. |
| | The investigations have shown that the poor opening times of the slats on the 109 G are caused by difficulties in manufacturing; when the slats are
perfectly stiff and installed correctly, flawless opening operation in climb and turning flight results.
Apparently, however, the supercharger air temperature, ~15° too low, can be attributed to the poor static head of the supercharger. |
|
For the full report see:
| Results: | After adjusting an imprecision in the installation, the kinematics functioned properly.
The landing gear doors were neither torn off at 650 km/h indicated airspeed, nor did any difficulties appear during retraction of the landing gear within the permissible speeds, even with the aircraft in a light slip.
An estimated extra 8 - 10 seconds is needed for lowering the landing gear than in the case without landing gear doors. |
| | The increase in speed with the landing gear doors installed is 8 km / h (+ - 3 km / h). |
|
For the full report see:
| Results: | Up to 30% taero, the machine was clearly stable in level flight with combat and cruise power.
During climb, however, it can only be described as slightly stable or neutral.
The neutral threshold for climbing with combat power can be assumed to be 30% taero. |
|
For the full report see:
| Results: | The tested radiator is sufficient at high speed flight near the ground for European summer temperature with an acceptable speed loss.
However, for tropical conditions, it is completely inadequate, since the flaps open fully already at +42°, which causes a speed loss of 48 km / h. At an air temperature of +50° + 5° the coolant reaches 115°.
This temperature is not permissible because high speed flight combat power can last longer than 10 min. |
|
| | | Sea level speed = 313 mph (503 km/h) after corrections. (Link to image)
|
|
For the full report see:
| Results: |
Speed with DB 601 E at sea level | Vo = 319 mph
| | Speed with DB 605 A at sea level | Vo = 315 mph
| | Speed with DB 601 E at FTH = 19,685 ft. | v = 386 mph
| | Speed with DB 605 A at FTH = 20,013 ft. | v = 389 mph
| | Service ceiling at 98 ft/min with DB 601 E | H = 40,354 ft.
| | Service ceiling at 98 ft/min with DB 605 A | H = 41,339 ft.
|
| The values stated above are measured at Climb and Combat power and are converted to normal day and correct setting of the supercharger regulator.
| | The influence of the radiator flap position on temperature and speed can be seen on page 9.
The coolant temperatures of both measured engines are similar, i.e. any large heat removal of the DB 605 is balanced by higher air and water speed.
| | | Climb Performance with DB 605 A. (Link to image)
| | | Speed Performance with DB 605 A. (Link to image)
|
|
For the full report see:
| Results: |
The deepened radiator leads to worse cooling in high speed flight than the production radiator.
However, this is partly attributed to the difference, rotated - rolled. (Test Report 109 05 T 43).
The speed on sheet 2 is not converted.
A speed comparison with the measurements in Test Report 109 18 L 42 is not possible since the two measurements are too far apart in time.
The flatter profile of the speed is due to the larger drag of the airflow through the deepened radiator.
| | | Influence of the radiator flap position on temperature and speed. (Link to image)
|
|
For the full report see:
| Results: |
The test flights resulted in the values listed below in the following table: |
| Version | Nr. | Vw mph (km/h) | Δ V km/h
| | V Tail Unit | 1 | 321 (516) | -0-
| | 2 | 320 (515)
| | Standard Tail Unit | 3 | 318 (512) | - 2.5
| | 4 | 319 (514)
|
|
For the full report see:
| Results: |
Maximum values reached with an initial altitude of 35,105' (10.7 km) above sea level and a flying weight of 6,393 lbs. (2900 kg.)
The dive was commenced at a horizontal speed of Va = 240 km/h and forward trimmed tailplane to +1° 15 ' by downturn and 100 % engine power.
The dive angle was about 70-80° (statement of the pilot.)
|
|
| Maximum indicated airspeed:
| Vamax = 458 mph (737 km/h) at 14,764' (4.5 km)
|
|
| Maximum true airspeed reached:
| Vwmax = 563 mph (906 km/h) at 19,029' (5.8 km)
|
|
| Maximum Mach Number reached:
| Mmax = 0.805 at 22,966 (7.0 km)
|
|
For the full report see:
See Also: